Oops! It appears that you have disabled your Javascript. In order for you to see this page as it is meant to appear, we ask that you please re-enable your Javascript!


Project Topic: Risk Management in Bank Lending (A Case of Equatorial Trust Bank)



The Nigerian financial institutions have faced difficulties over the years for a multitude of reasons but the major cause of serious banking problems in recent times continues to be directly related to lax credit standards for borrowers and counterparties, poor portfolio risk management or a lack of attention to changes in economic or other circumstances that can lead to a deterioration in the credit standing of a bank’s counterparties. Credit risk is most simply defined as the potential that a bank borrower will fail to meet the obligations in accordance with agreed terms. The goal of risk management in bank lending is to maximize a bank’s risk adjusted rate of return, maintaining risk exposure with acceptable parameters.


The problem of Bank distress in the Nigerian Banking Sector has been observed since 1930s. In fact, between 1930 and 1958, over 21 Bank failures were recorded. The Bank failures during the time were attributed to the domination of foreign Banks in terms of the exclusive patronage by British firms. Other factors that led to mass failure of the indigenous banks were low capital base, lack of managerial expertise and untrained personnel.

The deregulation of the financial system was embarked upon by the military administration in 1986 as part of the Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP). The deregulation witnessed sharp changes in banks’ operations, regulatory environment and the distress syndrome resurfaced again in Nigeria. The changes brought about by SAP included the liberalization of the foreign exchange and money markets, the introduction of prudential guidelines and accounting standards, increase in minimum paid-up capital, establishment of Nigerian Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC), relaxation of mandatory sectoral allocation of credits,  etc.

The Late 1980s and early 1990s were years of financial boom, as the number of players increased substantially in the system? For instance, between 1986 and 1989, about 38 new commercial and merchant banks were created. The increase in the number of banks over-stretched the existing human resources capacity of banks which resulted to many problems such as poor credit appraisal system, financial crimes, accumulation of poor asset quality, among others. The consequence was increase in the number of distress banks. During 1994 alone, two banks had their licenses suspended (Republic Bank Ltd and Broad Bank of Nigeria Ltd). Another four banks has their licenses revoked. Also in 1994, the number of banks adjudged distressed by the Central Bank rose by 10 to 42, excluding the four banks that were closed during the year. By the end of year in 1994, non-performing loans and advances constituted about 60.33 percent of the total deposits of the entire banking industry. Furthermore, the ratio of non-performing loans and advances to the total loans and advances in the entire banking industry was 43.03 percent while that for the distressed banks was 64.5 percent according to CBN Annual Report 1994. By the year 1998, up to 31 banks were being liquidated.

The Global Financial crisis is yet to run its full course, but is already one of the largest crises ever experienced according to the existing literature. With its roots in banking, the sub-prime mortgage crisis that commenced in the United States in 2007 soon resonated in other sectors of its financial system, and the economy at large. The crisis later spread to Europe and now has become a global phenomenon. The emerging economies were not isolated. In the wake of the United State Government bid to boost housing was a policy error that permitted sub-prime clientele unrestricted access to mortgage finance. Combined with the thriving derivative market, the horizon for credit expansion widened to unprecedented levels. The result was private over-borrowing accompanied by an internal debt crisis. As long as capital flows and credit expansion grew unchecked, lending expectedly spilt over from financing safe and productive investments to risky and speculative assets. Housing prices had trended upwards for ten consecutive years up to 2004, enticing speculators. Mortgages perfected imprudent lending practices.

The cannons of basic lending were never followed in credit creation. Credits were generally not collaterized in the mortgage sub-sector.

Credits, especially in mortgage finance and commercial real estates were excessive to the repayment ability of the borrower. The housing market was overpriced. Investors borrowed to enter the booming overpriced market without a thought that the market could ever crash. It crashed unexpectedly and commercial loan defaults became widespread. Financial institutions gradually became illiquid. Available stocks were dumped on the capital market to shore up liquidity. Banks became unwilling to lend to one another. The financial system was weakened by runs, bankruptcy, takeovers, job losses and bail-outs. United State financial institutions failed to honour maturing investments, especially placed by foreign investors.

The Nigerian economic recession of 1982 could not have dragged the rest of the world into a global recession because the quantum of foreign investments in the Nigerian economy was minimal. Although there were defaults in the return of deposits, it was an internal affair. Nigeria was in it alone and had to steer to good financial health on its own accord. There is hardly any bank anywhere in the world that does not have correspondence arrangement with a bank in the USA, at least for the confirmation and settlement of letters of credit as well as for the transfer of funds. By arrangement, all such idle funds are invested in the American financial system, especially on high-yielding derivatives.

According to October 2008 IMF World Economic Outlook, the global financial crisis did not have any direct and serious consequences on sub-Saharan African, of which Nigeria is one. However, Nigeria feels the pinch in various ways such as difficulty in sourcing new credit lines by banks and real-sector operators from abroad, possibility of non-renewal of expiring credit lines to banks sourced from abroad, withdrawal of liquid assets and other investment portfolio by foreigners, reduced inflow of foreign direct investments etc.

As at third quarter of 2009, there was a shift in the Nigerian banking system as a result of audit carried out by the central bank of Nigeria, the apex regulatory body, on Nigerian banks. Consequent upon their findings, the CBN replaced the leadership of Eight (8) Nigerian banks and injected N620 billion of liquidity into the sector for a rescue. This was a natural consequence of bad lending decisions by banks leading to huge provisions and erosion in their capital. A bulk of depositor’s money was lent for speculative purposes in the capital market. The attitude of some borrowers who are unwilling to repay even when they are known to have the means to service their debts. Such borrowers seek refuge under the inadequate legal framework and cumbersome loan recovery processes which make it difficult for the lending bank to foreclose collaterals. Obtaining judgment when a loan defaulter is sued is often lengthy, thereby increasing the cost of banking business in Nigeria. In the case of some small borrowers particularly in priority sector of agriculture and small and medium scale enterprise, they willfully defaulted on the wrong notion that the bank loans are part of their share of the “national cake”. There are also borrowers who through connivance with some banks’ staff take bank loans with no intention to repay such loans. These problems greatly impaired the quality of banks’ assets as non-performing loans and advances become unbearable and turn out to be a high burden on many of them.

Insider abuse by bank owners, directors and management staff is another factor which exacerbated loan defaults in some weak banks. Insider in those banks obtained loans and advances without adequate collaterals in contravention of banking regulations. Sometimes, the loan applications were poorly appraisal with inadequate documentation. Poor lending and borrowing culture was contributory to distress in the system.


The banking sector has a crucial role to play in the growth of Nigeria economy. A strong and viable banking industry which can facilitate local and international transactions is a necessary mechanism that any international investor would consider amongst other things prior to taking such investment decisions.

The cornerstone upon which every successful financial institution is built is nevertheless, a strong and effective credit management process. A process which reinforces and complements corporate objectives and goals. Managing risk requires a top down approach. If the board and bank executives are not supportive of the efforts, it will be difficult to assemble the resources to control the risks deemed acceptable. Wanting to manage the risks identified must be a part of a corporate culture. As risks are identified and a means to control those risks is also enacted, the organization has to have the ability to adapt.

It is in view of these, however, that this research paper undertakes to examine banks and the strategies in place to stem the tide of non-performing loans. The statement of problem is to critically appraise risk assessment techniques and suggest measure(s) that improve the quality of risk assets in banks.

The outcome of this research study is expected to assist stakeholders in the Nigerian baking industry in addressing the following inherent problems;

  • Reliance on the financial statements of the borrowers as a basis for lending which is fraught with serious danger.
  • Lack of understanding of the borrower’s business skills and credibility
  • Adequate collaterization of credits
  • Subvention of regulatory guidelines on credit creation
  • Lack of data/information concerning the economic and political situation that impact negatively on the debtor
  • Creation of new loans in total disregard to the performance of the existing ones.


It is widely believed that the major cause of distress in the banking system is as a result of poor risk management. To establish this premise, it is important that we find answers to the questions below;

  • Do the board of executive directors, credit review committee and others concerned in credit administration function effectively?
  • Are there established risk management procedures and programmes that are well documented and entrenched in Nigeria banks?
  • Are credits limits set, and are these limits strictly monitored to avoid extension of excessive credit to a specific counterparty?
  • Do the volumes of the banks’ risk asset have impact on its gross earnings?


The extent of distress in banks in Nigeria has become a source of worry to the banking public. This, to a great extent, has eroded the confidence of the public in the financial system. It has always been asserted that the major cause of failures in the system was as a result of non-performing credits engendered by insider abuse by bank owners, management staff, willful defaults by borrowers, etc.

In view of the risks prevalent in the credit risks management in Nigerian banks, this study is meant to:

  • Identify lapses in the credit risk management and proffer corrective measure(s) to enhance the banks overall credit quality.
  • Ascertain the bank’s capacity to assess risk with regards to the analysis and monitoring of the dynamics in the operating environment with a view to evaluating its impact on the bank’s past, present and future credit decisions.
  • Assess the role played by the regulatory authorities in enhancing bank’s risk management.
  • Identify if the perceived risk in a credit are matched by commensurate return through appropriate pricing of facility.


The hypothesis to be tested in the course of this research is related to research Question One and the last question: Do the board of directors, credit review committee and all concerned in credit creation function effectively and do the volume of banks’ risk assets has impact on its gross earning? This leads us to the following hypotheses:


H0:   The volume of the bank’s risk asset has no outstanding impact on its gross earnings and income

H1: The volume of the bank’s risk asset has outstanding impact on its gross earnings and income.


H0:   There is no correlation between the bank’s risk asset portfolio and the effectiveness of its credit risk management system.

H1:   There is a correlation between the bank’s risk asset portfolio and the effectiveness of its credit risk management system.


This study is set to analyze the credit risk that is inherent in Nigerian banking system. This is prompted by the need to have an efficient and effective risk management program to stem the tide of distress in Nigerian banking industry. Data from both qualitative and quantitative sources will be used to gain an insight and knowledge of the Nigerian banking industry. However, a structured questionnaire and interviews will be used to get relevant information on areas that requires further clarification.


Sequel to the enormous challenges before the banking institution in Nigeria in the risk management of their credit portfolio in ensuring minimal loan loss through maintenance of high quality risk assets while optimizing returns, this study is focusing on the potential financial loss resulting from the failure of customers to honour fully the terms of a loan. The paper will also examine the role played by the regulatory authorities in enhancing bank’s overall risk management through checks on compliance to credit policies in the system.

This research, however, will help the bank constitute an effective risk management program with an oversight from the board and senior management. Risk management requires a top down approach. The quality of bank management and especially, the risk management process are key in ensuring the safety and stability in the banking system. It is the aim of this research work to encourage the strict adherence to the rules and policies by the operators and regulatory authorities alike.

—This article is incomplete———–This article is incomplete———— It was extracted from a well articulated quality Project, Research Work/Material

Project Topic: Risk Management in Bank Lending (A Case of Equatorial Trust Bank)

To get the full report pay a token of 3,000 naira to the following account



ACCOUNT NUMBER: 4831029253

Immediately after the payment send your name, topic of interest, e-mail address, teller number and location to the following phone number: 07035282233 or email: ralphemeka@gmail.com

The full report will immediately be forwarded to you.


Related project topics and materials

The Impact of Marketing Concepts In Nigeria Banking Industry -A Study of Enterprise Bank Ltd Abakaliki Branch

The Relationship between Public Capital Expenditure and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of Nigeria

The Impact of Money Supply on Inflation in Nigeria (1990 – 2007)

Poor Accounting Practices: Bane of Small and Medium Scale Enterprises in Nigeria

Pension Scheme Management in the Nigerian Public Sector


To purchase complete Project Material, Pay a token of N3, 000 to our bank accounts below:



ACCOUNT NUMBER: 4831029253




ACCOUNT NUMBER: 3092548117

After paying the sum of N3, 000 into any of our bank accounts, send the below details to our Phone: 07035282233

  1. Your Depositors Name
  2. Teller Number
  3. Amount Paid
  4. Project Topic
  5. Your Email Address

Send the above details to: 07035282233 AFTER payment. We will send your complete project materials to your email 30 Mins after payment.

uniprojectsearch.com will only provide papers as a reference for your research. The papers ordered and produced should be used as a guide or framework for your own paper. It is the aim of uniprojectsearch.com to only provide guidance by which the paper should be pursued. We are neither encouraging any form of plagiarism nor are we advocating the use of the papers produced herein for cheating.

This entry was posted in Department of Banking and Finance, Department of Business Administration, Management Sciences and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>